Planning Postcode Lottery 2026: Approval Odds and Wait Times by Council | PlanWatch
Planning Data · 13 min read
person

Ben Thompson

Planning Research Lead, PlanWatch · Updated 2026-10-02

The Planning Postcode Lottery 2026: Where You Live Decides Your Odds and Your Wait

Original PlanWatch data: refusal odds vary 17-fold between councils, only 43.8% of decisions land within 8 weeks, and new homes are refused 3.2x as often as extensions.

search Check Your Postcode check_circle Free search · Paid instant alerts

Two identical extensions can get very different answers depending on which side of a council boundary they fall. Using official 2025 statistics and PlanWatch's own register of 343,359 applications across 377 UK councils, we measured how much the odds and the wait vary. An application in Epping Forest was 17 times as likely to be refused as one in Fareham. In East Lindsey, the median wait for a decision was 83.5 days. In West Oxfordshire it was 51.

Headline figures journalists can quote
17x
An application in Epping Forest was 17 times as likely to be refused as one in Fareham (33.9% vs 2% refused, 2025).
43.8%
of decisions in PlanWatch's sample were issued within 8 calendar weeks of registration. The official "in time" figure is 90.6%.
3.2x
A new home was 3.2 times as likely to be refused as an extension (30.5% vs 9.4%).
83.5 vs 51
median days to a decision in East Lindsey vs West Oxfordshire, the slowest and fastest of 48 councils measured.
Source: PlanWatch analysis of 343,359 planning register records from 377 UK councils (Oct 2025 to Sep 2026) and MHCLG PS2 statistics (England, 2025). Free to use with a link to this page.

TL;DR

  • Approval odds: England approved 87% of 300,645 decisions in 2025. Fareham approved 98%; Epping Forest approved 66.1%. London was the toughest region (82.5%) and the North East the most permissive (91.7%).
  • The wait: only 43.8% of the decisions in our sample were issued within 8 calendar weeks of registration, and 20.5% took more than 13 weeks. Officially, 90.6% are "in time", because agreed extensions of time count as on time.
  • Slowest and fastest: East Lindsey, Warwick and City of London had the longest median waits. West Oxfordshire, Epsom and Ewell and Chelmsford were the quickest.
  • What you build matters as much as where: extensions were approved 90.6% of the time, loft and dormer schemes 86.7%, changes of use 75.9% and new homes just 69.5%.

Jump to: Approval odds by council · Decision times · Extensions vs new homes · What it means for you · Methodology · FAQ

The approval lottery: highest and lowest councils

The fairest council-by-council comparison of approval odds is the government's own: MHCLG district planning statistics, which every council reports in the same way. For calendar year 2025 they cover 300,645 decisions by 307 English planning authorities. PlanWatch's full approval-rate ranking lists every council. Here are the two ends.

Approval rate, 2025: the 10 most and 10 least permissive councils in England
England 87%Fareham: 98% approved of 595 decisions (2025)Fareham98%Hammersmith and Fulham: 97.2% approved of 1,401 decisions (2025)Hammersmith & Fulham97.2%North Kesteven: 97.2% approved of 637 decisions (2025)North Kesteven97.2%Cumberland: 96.8% approved of 1,146 decisions (2025)Cumberland96.8%Redcar and Cleveland: 96.7% approved of 425 decisions (2025)Redcar & Cleveland96.7%Cheltenham: 96.5% approved of 1,021 decisions (2025)Cheltenham96.5%Mansfield: 96.4% approved of 304 decisions (2025)Mansfield96.4%Bolsover: 96.3% approved of 294 decisions (2025)Bolsover96.3%City of London: 96.2% approved of 448 decisions (2025)City of London96.2%Redditch: 96.2% approved of 159 decisions (2025)Redditch96.2%Waltham Forest: 74.4% approved of 1,332 decisions (2025)Waltham Forest74.4%Redbridge: 74% approved of 1,711 decisions (2025)Redbridge74%Mole Valley: 73% approved of 1,025 decisions (2025)Mole Valley73%Havering: 72.8% approved of 1,476 decisions (2025)Havering72.8%Oadby and Wigston: 71.7% approved of 279 decisions (2025)Oadby & Wigston71.7%Gravesham: 71.6% approved of 627 decisions (2025)Gravesham71.6%Windsor and Maidenhead: 68.9% approved of 1,576 decisions (2025)Windsor & Maidenhead68.9%Hounslow: 68.3% approved of 1,284 decisions (2025)Hounslow68.3%Barking and Dagenham: 66.2% approved of 713 decisions (2025)Barking & Dagenham66.2%Epping Forest: 66.1% approved of 1,350 decisions (2025)Epping Forest66.1%

The 10 most permissive councils (2025)

Rank Council Region Approved Decisions
1 Fareham South East 98% 595
2 Hammersmith and Fulham London 97.2% 1,401
3 North Kesteven East Midlands 97.2% 637
4 Cumberland North West 96.8% 1,146
5 Redcar and Cleveland North East 96.7% 425
6 Cheltenham South West 96.5% 1,021
7 Mansfield East Midlands 96.4% 304
8 Bolsover East Midlands 96.3% 294
9 City of London London 96.2% 448
10 Redditch West Midlands 96.2% 159

The 10 least permissive councils (2025)

Rank Council Region Approved Decisions
1 Epping Forest East of England 66.1% 1,350
2 Barking and Dagenham London 66.2% 713
3 Hounslow London 68.3% 1,284
4 Windsor and Maidenhead South East 68.9% 1,576
5 Gravesham South East 71.6% 627
6 Oadby and Wigston East Midlands 71.7% 279
7 Havering London 72.8% 1,476
8 Mole Valley South East 73% 1,025
9 Redbridge London 74% 1,711
10 Waltham Forest London 74.4% 1,332

The spread is wide. A refusal rate of 2% in Fareham against 33.9% in Epping Forest is a 17-fold difference in the chance of hearing "no". Five of the ten toughest councils are London boroughs and three more (Epping Forest, Windsor and Maidenhead, Mole Valley) border London, where pressure on space, design scrutiny and Green Belt policy are all at their highest.

By region

Region Approval rate (2025) Decisions
North East 91.7% 8,758
East Midlands 89.8% 21,924
South West 89.5% 37,460
North West 88.3% 28,176
West Midlands 87.8% 24,074
Yorkshire and the Humber 87.4% 23,171
South East 87.2% 58,800
East of England 86.1% 39,422
London 82.5% 53,872

Want one council's figure? Each has its own page: for example Fareham or Epping Forest. The approval-rates hub lists them all.

The waiting lottery: how long councils really take

Councils have 8 weeks to decide most applications, or 13 weeks for major schemes. Official statistics say 90.6% of 2025 decisions were made "in time". That figure counts a decision as on time if it meets a deadline the applicant has agreed to extend, so it measures paperwork rather than the wait.

PlanWatch measured the wait itself. For 9,409 applications registered between January and March 2026 that have since been decided, we compared the date on each council's register with the decision date on the same register.

  • Median wait: 59 days, just over the 56-day (8-week) target. Householder projects: 57 days.
  • Within 8 weeks: 43.8%. Over 13 weeks: 20.5%. One in ten took more than 117 days.
  • These are lower bounds. Applications from that quarter that are still undecided are not in the sample, and every one of them has already waited more than six months.
Median days from registration to decision: the 10 slowest and 10 fastest councils
8-week targetEast Lindsey: median 83.5 days, 91.8% took over 8 weeks (98 decisions)East Lindsey83.5 daysWarwick: median 83 days, 80% took over 8 weeks (145 decisions)Warwick83 daysCity of London: median 80.5 days, 73.4% took over 8 weeks (184 decisions)City of London80.5 daysWigan: median 80 days, 90.9% took over 8 weeks (110 decisions)Wigan80 daysGuildford: median 78 days, 76.9% took over 8 weeks (173 decisions)Guildford78 daysBlaby: median 74 days, 75.5% took over 8 weeks (98 decisions)Blaby74 daysLuton: median 73 days, 74.7% took over 8 weeks (91 decisions)Luton73 daysSouth Lanarkshire: median 73 days, 72.8% took over 8 weeks (173 decisions)South Lanarkshire73 daysMonmouthshire: median 72.5 days, 63.8% took over 8 weeks (94 decisions)Monmouthshire72.5 daysOldham: median 72 days, 80.3% took over 8 weeks (132 decisions)Oldham72 daysBradford: median 56 days, 33.3% took over 8 weeks (132 decisions)Bradford56 daysReigate and Banstead: median 56 days, 33.3% took over 8 weeks (183 decisions)Reigate & Banstead56 daysNorwich: median 56 days, 43.4% took over 8 weeks (175 decisions)Norwich56 daysRutland: median 56 days, 46.7% took over 8 weeks (120 decisions)Rutland56 daysNewcastle-under-Lyme: median 55 days, 37.6% took over 8 weeks (93 decisions)Newcastle-under-Lyme55 daysChelmsford: median 54 days, 20.1% took over 8 weeks (268 decisions)Chelmsford54 daysLeeds: median 54 days, 27.2% took over 8 weeks (591 decisions)Leeds54 daysBury: median 54 days, 43.7% took over 8 weeks (197 decisions)Bury54 daysEpsom and Ewell: median 53 days, 26% took over 8 weeks (127 decisions)Epsom & Ewell53 daysWest Oxfordshire: median 51 days, 28.5% took over 8 weeks (207 decisions)West Oxfordshire51 days

Slowest councils (median days, registration to decision)

Council Median days Over 8 weeks Decisions measured
East Lindsey 83.5 91.8% 98
Warwick 83 80% 145
City of London 80.5 73.4% 184
Wigan 80 90.9% 110
Guildford 78 76.9% 173
Blaby 74 75.5% 98
Luton 73 74.7% 91
South Lanarkshire 73 72.8% 173
Monmouthshire 72.5 63.8% 94
Oldham 72 80.3% 132

Fastest councils

Council Median days Over 8 weeks Decisions measured
West Oxfordshire 51 28.5% 207
Epsom and Ewell 53 26% 127
Chelmsford 54 20.1% 268
Leeds 54 27.2% 591
Bury 54 43.7% 197
Newcastle-under-Lyme 55 37.6% 93
Bradford 56 33.3% 132
Reigate and Banstead 56 33.3% 183
Norwich 56 43.4% 175
Rutland 56 46.7% 120

The contrast at the extremes is stark. In East Lindsey, 91.8% of decisions came after the 8-week mark. In Chelmsford, only 20.1% did. The table covers the 48 councils where PlanWatch captured at least 80 decision dates in the quarter; it includes councils in Scotland and Wales, which have their own targets.

notifications_active

Don't miss the 21-day window

Neighbours usually get 21 days to comment. A PlanWatch postcode alert tells you the day an application near you is registered.

searchSet up a free postcode search

Extensions vs new homes: what you build changes the odds

Where you live is half the lottery. The other half is the project. PlanWatch classified 27,265 decided applications with a stated outcome by what they proposed, using the same project categories as our approval-odds checker.

Approval rate by project type (PlanWatch register data, decisions with a stated outcome)
Garage conversion: 93.9% approved (675 decisions)Garage conversion93.9%Extension: 90.6% approved (6,505 decisions)Extension90.6%Garden building: 88.6% approved (1,040 decisions)Garden building88.6%Loft / dormer: 86.7% approved (1,793 decisions)Loft / dormer86.7%Driveway / kerb: 84.7% approved (478 decisions)Driveway / kerb84.7%Change of use: 75.9% approved (1,610 decisions)Change of use75.9%New home (1-9): 69.5% approved (627 decisions)New home (1-9)69.5%
Share of decisions issued more than 8 weeks after registration, by project type
Garage conversion: 43.1% took longer than 8 weeks; median 56 days (274 decisions)Garage conversion43.1%Extension: 51.7% took longer than 8 weeks; median 57 days (2,576 decisions)Extension51.7%Garden building: 58.6% took longer than 8 weeks; median 60 days (396 decisions)Garden building58.6%Loft / dormer: 53.6% took longer than 8 weeks; median 58 days (623 decisions)Loft / dormer53.6%Driveway / kerb: 64.3% took longer than 8 weeks; median 65 days (182 decisions)Driveway / kerb64.3%Change of use: 69.8% took longer than 8 weeks; median 72 days (725 decisions)Change of use69.8%New home (1-9): 75% took longer than 8 weeks; median 72.5 days (292 decisions)New home (1-9)75%
Project Approved Decisions Median days Over 8 weeks
Garage conversion 93.9% 675 56 43.1%
Extension 90.6% 6,505 57 51.7%
Garden building 88.6% 1,040 60 58.6%
Loft / dormer 86.7% 1,793 58 53.6%
Driveway / kerb 84.7% 478 65 64.3%
Change of use 75.9% 1,610 72 69.8%
New home (1-9) 69.5% 627 72.5 75%

What stands out:

  1. Small home improvements sail through. Garage conversions (93.9%) and extensions (90.6%) are the safest bets, and garage conversions are also the quickest to decide.
  2. New homes are the hardest sell. 69.5% approval means nearly one in three small housing schemes was refused, and 75% took longer than 8 weeks.
  3. Changes of use split councils. At 75.9% approval they are refused 2.6 times as often as extensions. This is where HMO controls, loss of shops and loss of family housing policies bite: see our Article 4 HMO directions table.
  4. Loft and dormer schemes (86.7%) do slightly worse than ground-floor extensions, mostly on design and overlooking. Many need no application at all: see dormer planning permission.

A robustness check. Some council portals publish a generic "Decided" status, which leaves refusals unlabelled. Re-running the project comparison on only the 101 councils whose registers label both approvals and refusals gives almost identical results: extensions 90.4%, changes of use 74.9%, new homes 68.8%.

What this means if you are applying or objecting

If you are applying:

  • Check your council's record first. Look up its approval rate and recent decisions on similar projects nearby. A refused scheme two doors down tells you more than any national average.
  • Budget for 10 to 12 weeks, not 8. In most councils, the median decision lands after the target. If you have a builder booked, leave slack.
  • Consider whether you need permission at all. Many extensions, lofts and outbuildings are permitted development. A lawful development certificate costs half the planning fee and confirms it in writing.
  • If you are refused, you have 12 weeks to appeal a householder decision. See what to do after a refusal.

If you are a neighbour: your window to comment is usually 21 days from when the council notifies you or posts a site notice. In slow councils, applications can sit for months, but the comment window does not wait. See how long planning permission takes and how to object.

notifications_active

Know first when something is planned near you

Search any postcode free. Upgrade for instant alerts the day a new application is registered.

searchSearch your postcode

Methodology

Approval rates by council and region come from MHCLG's PS2 district planning application statistics (open data table), calendar year 2025, updated 7 April 2026. Approval rate = decisions granted divided by decisions granted or refused. It is the same dataset behind PlanWatch's UK planning approval rates 2026 report, which is downloadable as CSV.

Decision times and project-type outcomes come from PlanWatch's own database of planning register records, collected from council planning portals:

  • Scope. 343,359 applications registered between 1 October 2025 and 30 September 2026 across 377 councils in England, Scotland and Wales. We excluded applications to discharge conditions, non-material amendments, prior approvals, lawful development certificates, demolition notices and county-matter consultations, because they follow different rules.
  • Outcomes. Council portals describe outcomes in hundreds of different ways. We mapped each status to approved, approved with conditions, refused or withdrawn using PlanWatch's outcome classifier. Statuses that say only "Decided" were left out rather than guessed. Withdrawals are excluded from approval rates. 27,265 decisions had a stated outcome.
  • Project types. Assigned from the application description using the same keyword rules as PlanWatch's approval-odds tool, in priority order (major development, new home, change of use, loft, garage conversion, garden building, extension, driveway). Tree works, listed building consents and adverts were classified but are not shown in the charts.
  • Decision times. For the 9,409 decided applications registered from January to March 2026 that had a decision date on the council register, we measured calendar days from the register date to the decision date (1 to 365 days). Depending on the portal, the register date is the date received or the date validated. Where it is the date received, the time includes validation, which the statutory clock does not. Councils are shown only where we captured at least 80 decision dates.
  • Limits. Decisions still pending are excluded, so true waits are longer than shown. Coverage of decision dates varies by portal, so the council timing table covers 48 councils, not all of them. Approval rates from register data are not directly comparable with the official figures.

Journalists and researchers: the figures in the headline box can be used with a link to this page. For the official approval-rate dataset, download the CSV.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which council approves the most planning applications?

Fareham, at 98% of 595 decisions in 2025 (MHCLG). Hammersmith and Fulham and North Kesteven followed at 97.2%.

Which council refuses the most planning applications?

Epping Forest had England's lowest approval rate in 2025 at 66.1%, followed by Barking and Dagenham and Hounslow. London was the toughest region.

How long does a planning decision really take?

In our sample the median was 59 days from registration to decision, and 43.8% were decided within 8 weeks. The official in-time rate is higher because agreed extensions count as on time.

Are extensions more likely to be approved than new houses?

Yes: 90.6% against 69.5%. A new home was 3.2 times as likely to be refused.

Can I use these figures in an article?

Yes, with credit to PlanWatch and a link to this page.

Does a high approval rate mean my application will be approved?

No. Rates reflect what gets submitted as well as how strict the council is. Your application is judged on its own merits.

Free — no card needed

Save a postcode to your free PlanWatch account

Free accounts save one postcode so it is ready whenever you want to check what has been applied for nearby. Paid plans add instant email alerts for new applications near a saved postcode.

Free: search plus one saved postcode. We never sell your details, and you can remove your postcode at any time.

Find your council →

Check if This Affects Your Area

Search your postcode to see planning applications near you — free, instant results. Know what's happening before it's too late.

check_circle Free search check_circle Instant results check_circle 378 councils